A Question of Perspective

Big numbers are hard to put in perspective. We hear millions, billions and trillions thrown around a lot in finance, but it requires a real effort to think about how much that actually is.

A useful way of gaining perspective is to turn it into time periods (helpfully calculated by NASA, so you know it’s accurate*).

If you went back in time for one million seconds, it would be Friday, 23rd June. 12 days.

If you went back in time for one billion seconds, it would be Sunday, 27th October, 1991. Nearly 32 YEARS.

But the really mind blowing one is this…

If you went back in time for one trillion seconds, you’d be 32,000 years in the past. Days of the week would be irrelevant, you’d be more worried about the fact that ice sheets covered most of the UK, and your closest friend was this guy:

Source: National Geographic

So, when we hear that the UK currently has a national debt of around £2.5 trillion**, we can acknowledge that is a LOT of debt.

But we shouldn’t panic too much.

Because when you put what the UK has borrowed up against what the UK is worth, things look a little better.

And that’s what the debt/GDP ratio below does (all the way back to the reign of King James II). 

UK National Debt as % of GDP

Source: Deutsche Bank/GFD 

In 1815, after the Napoleonic wars, UK debt was £854 million – 1/3000th of today’s level. But that represented nearly 250% of GDP!

Today the debt/GDP ratio is 100%. Similar to most other developed nations, and not exceptional vs history.  

Perspective is everything!

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.
Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Mortgages – UK vs US

Due to a shared history and a common language, the UK and the US have a lot of cultural similarities.

If something (a film, a book, music, a play, a brand) is popular in the UK, it’s got a good chance of being popular in the US, and vice versa. You give us Friends and Hamilton, we’ll trade you for Downton Abbey and James Corden (he went to school not 800 yards from where I am typing).

But in one important area, the US and the UK parted ways nearly one hundred years ago.

Mortgages

In the Roaring 1920’s, the US mortgage market looked quite like the UK. 2-year and 3-year fixed term mortgages were normal.

Then the Great Depression hit. Hundreds of thousands of people lost their homes. Millions more found themselves underwater.

The US government stepped in. And to avoid repeating history, it basically said “mortgages should be fixed for as long as possible”. The 30-year mortgage was born. Today, more than 70% of American homeowners have 30-year fixed mortgages.

In the UK that didn’t happen.

Your choice here is between a variable rate, or a short-term fix. Anything more than five years is very rare.

Which leads to the huge difference in the chart below:

Source: Bank of England/Mortgage Bankers Association/7IM

In the short-term, this means that changes in interest rates hit mortgage-owning households far more quickly in the UK than in the US.

Whereas in America, if rates go up, you don’t have to do anything – you’ve capped your costs for 30 years. If they go down, you re-mortgage and lock in a lower rate … for thirty years! It really is win-win.

And, having had nearly 100 years of these type of mortgages, consumer behaviour has changed between the two countries. Imagine knowing your mortgage costs were capped for three decades – if you had established your budget and knew what you were paying, wouldn’t you feel more relaxed?!

If our next import from the US was a range of 30-year mortgage deals (rather than another Marvel superhero film), I wonder how quickly the above chart would change?

The above does beg the question though, why have increased interest rates in the US been so effective in bringing down inflation, if mortgage borrowers are seemingly unaffected, when in the UK higher interest rates seem to be having little effect? Answers on a postcard please!

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

7 Big Questions!

I am indebted to my friends at 7IM for what follows.

During these very uncertain times, all fund managers and financial advisers have received many questions about the economy and prospects for investment returns going forward. 7IM have collected those most frequently asked and offer their insights below.

By the way, the question I personally have been asked more than any other recently is number 5. The answer provided by 7IM is verbatim my usual response, as clients who have asked me this question will attest.

1. Why has the significant fall in oil and gas prices not yet fed through to much lower inflation levels?

Ahmer Tirmizi, Head of Fixed Income Strategy

Inflation is defined in different ways. For some, it’s just a number, defined as the growth in prices - an objective measure without debate. For others, inflation is something that is felt - we remember how much the weekly shop costs us compared to last time. Particularly when everything is going up.

Take petrol prices. We find it easy to remember that petrol prices had at one point doubled from the lows of the Covid recession to the highs of 2022. Every time we go to the pumps, we remember that feeling of filling up at or above £2 per litre. At the same time, food prices were going up, housing costs were going up… every cost was going up. Rising petrol was just another squeeze on incomes. However, on the flipside, we don’t feel that much happier now that petrol prices are down by a quarter from their 2022 highs; or that they are below the level they were when Russia invaded Ukraine. What’s even harder to believe is that, as they stand right now, petrol prices aren’t that different to what they were 10 years ago. Prices have gone from around £1.35/litre to £1.45/litre in that time - that’s around 0.7% rise per year.

So, it turns out the fall in oil prices has led to falls in the cost of filling up. However, while it might be in the numbers, until other prices fall more widely, we are unlikely to feel it. Going forward, we believe the overall inflation basket is close to peaking and will start to fall soon. The last inflation print in the UK shows inflation falling substantially from its peak. It will be a slow and bumpy process, but eventually, we will start to see and feel inflation coming down to more normal levels.

2. Are we facing a banking crisis similar to 2008?

Salim Jaffar, Investment Analyst

In one word. No.

The global financial crisis was many years and mistakes in the making. Risky lending practices that were facilitated by decades of deregulation ultimately led to an extreme housing bubble and its eventual bursting. This led to the collapse of a number of major financial institutions. Unfortunately, almost everyone was impacted since most people have some financial tie to housing… as Edward Leamer said, “housing is the business cycle”.

What’s going on at the moment is different.

In the US, some non-systemically important banks have mismanaged their balance sheet risk. Rising rates meant that the bonds they held as collateral against deposits couldn’t be sold for enough when people tried to redeem their deposits.

In Europe, something largely unrelated happened. For years Credit Suisse had been struggling with reputational issues as a result of being pretty near the centre of the majority of banking scandals over the past few years. On top of this, the bank was having serious profitability issues. This is what allowed for the speed and scale of deposit flight that we saw. Currently, no other systemically important European or US banks are finding themselves in this kind of hot water.

The 2008 crisis was economy-wide. What’s going on right now with banks is not economy-wide.

3. Should we be worried about the US debt ceiling?

Ben Kumar, Head of Equity Strategy

The debt ceiling is not an economic problem – the US can borrow money, and will pay it back – it’s a political one, created by the strange and complex system that is US politics.

We’ve had a century of shenanigans with the debt ceiling (it was introduced in 1917). Each time, a solution is found, that makes the whole thing even more roundabout and complicated to resolve next time, but ultimately sorts it all out.

The solution this time will be tense and nerve-racking if you follow the minutiae of Congressional activity. But if you can ignore the breathless reports from Washington DC, the world will keep on turning – soon we’ll be needlessly worrying about the 2024 election instead. Sigh.

4. The UK economy seems to be more resilient than expected. Does this mean it’s an opportune place to invest?

Salim Jaffar

It can be argued that the UK has been surprisingly resilient, but I think there are two main points to unpick here:

Investing in the FTSE 100 isn’t really investing in the UK economy, it’s just investing in companies that are historically listed in the UK. Less than 20% of the revenue earned by FTSE 100 companies comes from the UK. This is one reason why the UK market has been quite resilient despite high inflation and other economic indicators suggesting that the UK is struggling.

A second point I would make is that the main reason the FTSE 100 has performed well over the past couple of years is mostly because of the sectors that make up the index. The FTSE 100 is concentrated in sectors such as financials, healthcare, and energy, which have stood up well to post covid challenges in a way other sectors haven’t.

This is why we think that there are opportunities in the UK; you just have to be a little more selective than holding all UK-listed companies, which is why we hold the FTSE 100 as opposed to the FTSE All-share or 250, and also why we have specific sector allocations to healthcare, materials, and bank debt.

5. In a world of higher interest rates, is investing still worth it? Surely cash is now more attractive?

Ben Kumar

Let’s address the big point. Cash rates on bank accounts are more attractive than they’ve been in a long time. But inflation is far worse than it’s been in a long time too…

So, while it was grim getting paid 0% on savings through the 2010s, it helped that inflation was around 2%. Your cash was worth about 2% less by the end of every year. Now, although you might get 3% or 4% on a bank account, inflation is at 9%! You’ll get some interest, which is nice – but even after that, your cash is worth ~5% less by the end of the year!

Until savings rates are above inflation, cash is a negative return strategy – guaranteed.

Whereas investing isn’t a guaranteed return (have you read all of the disclaimers!?), it is one which, over time, can help to beat inflation. In fact, investing in the shares of a company is a way to get inflation working for you rather than against you. Those price increases which make our shopping more expensive are being made by the very companies you invest in! Company earnings tend to beat inflation over time as the management teams increase prices and cut costs. That’s better than the bank manager is doing on your savings account!

6. Why do you think there’s likely to be a recession in the US? How bad, and what are the risks?

Ahmer Tirmizi

Recessions are often thought of as events, and we label them as such. The Lehman Brothers default of 2008 or the Y2K bust of the early 2000s. In truth, they’re not usually specific events with specific dates but rather processes. These processes involve a messy interaction between businesses, consumers and governments that leads to the economy slowing down, so much so that it eventually contracts.

While each recession is labelled differently, the process often follows a very similar pattern. Primarily, interest rates tend to rise sharply – if mortgage costs go up, households think twice about their next purchases. Additionally, prices (particularly necessities like food and energy) tend to rise sharply, squeezing incomes. This leads people to tighten their belts as they focus on the things they need (to heat their homes and feed their families) over the things they don’t (a new car or a holiday abroad). And finally, company profits tend to fall as spending comes down. If people buy less stuff, companies earn less money. And when profits fall, companies tighten their belts, potentially laying off workers as a result.

As things stand, these patterns are present today. We’ve seen the sharpest rises in interest rates in a generation. And we’ve also seen the sharpest rise in prices in a generation (even if they might be easing now). The impact is clear, consumers are slowly reining in their spending. Housing is slowing down and global manufacturing is contracting. Consequently profits, as measured by earnings per share, are down from the highs, with possibly more to come. These factors leave us positioned cautiously.

It isn’t all doom, though. Just like recessions, recoveries aren’t events with specific dates. They are processes with very similar patterns to the past. So, while those patterns are currently pointing to a recession, this won’t be forever. Eventually, our view is that interest rates and inflation will come down. And when they do, this will set in motion the subsequent economic recovery that will eventually take place.

7. Are there any opportunities to MAKE money in a recession?

Ben Kumar

Of course! You just have to be patient and prepared to hold your nerve.

Some investments, such as healthcare companies, should do well because their earnings stream isn’t related to the economic cycle – other investors will rotate out of their cyclical exposures into healthcare.

Other investments, such as mining companies, should do well because they’re already cheap – a recession can’t really hurt them much more, and they’re paying out a nice chunky dividend yield.

And, investing in government bonds in a recession has tended to work. Rates fall, bond prices rise. US treasuries and UK Gilts aren’t exciting. But they work!

Graham’s Summary

Pulling all of those questions and answers together, we end up once again with the view that, whatever the turbulence we are currently facing, the principles of disciplined long-term investing have not changed. These issues will pass and markets will progress once again …….. as they ALWAYS have in the past.

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

The Big Apple!

In the 1920’s, New York City was the biggest in the world, with a population of more than 7 million people.

And it was around then it became known as the “Big Apple”, which went 1920s viral after a horseracing journalist heard a couple of stableboys using that nickname https://gothamist.com/arts-entertainment/big-apple-nickname-origin-nyc-history.

There’s only one Big Apple in the 2020’s though – and it’s not New York!

The new Big Apple is, well, Apple.

The value of Apple is around £2.2 trillion. The problem is that number is soooo big that it seems meaningless.

Here’s some context to help us understand just how big that number really is - The total value of the one hundred companies in the FTSE 100 is about £2.1 trillion.

This means that Apple is worth 5% MORE (£100 billion) than the entire FTSE 100 Index!

Now, Apple is a brilliantly run company with top quality products and an incredibly loyal customer base, which will be around for a long time (which is why it’s Warren Buffett’s largest holding). But come on!

Last year, Apple had about £320 billion of sales around the world, and turned that into about £76 billion of profit.

But the hundred stocks of the FTSE 100 - Shell and BP and HSBC and GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca and Diageo and Unilever and the rest, had £1.5 trillion of sales! And generated £215 billion of profit!

Maybe it’s because it’s easier to get excited about a single company (iPhones! Airpods! Steve Jobs!) compared to an index (diversification … sectors … dividends).

But things can change. New York lost its crown as the world’s biggest city in the 1960’s. Can Apple stay this big forever…?

Currently, Apple is also ebi’s (Clearwater’s investment partners) biggest holding but at just 1.0353% in Portfolio 50.

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Potential for a huge rally in the stockmarket?

As it is Monday morning, I thought we could all do with a little bit of cheering up. The following is from a piece I was reading at the weekend on the ‘Markets Insider website.

Investors are so bearish on stocks that the market could see a potentially huge rally as the inflation situation improves, according to Fundstrat's head of research Tom Lee.

In a note on Monday, Lee pointed to strong bearish sentiment in the stock market, with 41% of investors saying they felt pessimistic on their outlook for stocks over the next six months, according to the latest AAII survey. Lee added that the majority of Fundstrat's institutional investor clients believed the S&P 500 would soon plunge by about 15% to retest its low in October of last year. 

But that's contrary to bullish indicators that are flashing in the market, Lee said, largely due to inflation falling. He forecasted that the benchmark index would actually rise 14% to 4,750 over the next 12 months.

"Investor position is so negative, hard to cause further downside," he said, adding that less sticky inflation would resolve many of the issues that are turning investors so bearish.

Inflation has been on a slow but steady decline for nearly all of the past year, cooling to 4.9% in April's Consumer Price Index report. Though some economists have warned inflation could remain stubborn at 3-4%, Lee has made the case that prices could be set to see a steep drop due to falling indicators like housing costs.

Falling inflation is likely to give the Federal Reserve reason to dial back its tightening of monetary policy which could be bullish for equities.

Though investors are still skittish over recent banking turmoil, the debt ceiling crisis, and a potential corporate earnings recession, falling inflation should resolve many issues markets are fretting about, Lee said.

If you want to keep those positive thoughts for now, I probably wouldn’t read this last paragraph from the same article.

Other Wall Street strategists are still sounding that alarms for this year, with Bank of America warning that the economy could tip into recession as soon as this quarter. Lee, for his part, has been bullish on stocks for most of the past year's bear market, and previously predicted the S&P 500 to hit a new record last year, though the index ultimately notched its worst performance since 2008.

As the famous baseball catcher and later manager, Yogi Berra once supposedly said, "It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future."

Have a good week everyone.

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

The Re-emergence of India

We often think of India as an emerging economy (it wasn’t long ago that it was referred to as ‘third world’), but did you catch this news last week? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-65380148

We won’t ever know the exact date or the precise baby who tipped the scales, but very roughly it now appears that India has overtaken China in terms of population.

It’s been a good couple of years for India in league table terms – in 2022, it overtook the UK in terms of total size of economy – becoming the fifth largest economy in the world.

But, with the right lens applied, this can be seen as just a return to normal for India, after a temporary blip in form.

Looking over 2000 years gives a sense of that … India is in Orange (note that the below chart compresses the first 1500 years due to lack of available data):

Source: “Statistics on World Population, GDP and Per Capita GDP, 1 -2008 AD, Angus Maddison, University of Groningen/7IM

Up until 1700 (the white line on the chart), India was the richest place on Earth, representing about a quarter of global GDP.

For most of human history, economics equalled demographics. The more workers a country had – the more farmers, smiths, hunters etc - the more output it would create. People = power.

Then the industrial revolution came. Suddenly, one man with a machine could do the work of hundreds. And Western economies – the ones with the machines – boomed. It saw two and a half centuries of dominance of small populations over larger ones (sometimes in pretty distasteful ways – although we don’t want to go into a debate about empire/colonialism).

But those 200-year-old benefits are starting to fade. Technology has started to give economic power back to individuals – which means population is starting to matter again.

And by 2050, the top 10 most populated countries will likely include current economic minnows such as Ethiopia, Pakistan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo … Maybe the world order is about to change once again.

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.
Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Surreal Snapshots!

I am indebted to my friends at 7IM for the following, which I found quite fascinating.

A snapshot of financial markets really can record the most remarkable moments.

Last week was the three-year anniversary of one of the strangest financial market events ever.

On 20th April 2020, the price for of the West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil contract went negative!

Although this market oddity only lasted a day, it was an extremely visible signal of just how strange the world was during the early days of COVID-19 lockdowns – and a great reminder that in times of panic, financial markets don’t behave rationally.

Here’s another incredible oil-related example from the same period.

In mid-2020, Shell and BP were the fifth and eighth biggest oil companies in the world, between them employing 155,000 people, and generating $199 billion in sales.

At the same time, Zoom Video Communications had 2,700 employees, and was going to do around $620 million in sales in 2020.

Now, of course, 2020 was the year of Zoom. It became one of the key tools in our day to day lives – working, socialising, pub quizzing and so on. Even so, it wasn’t more important than ENERGY!

But investors were panicking, thinking that no-one would ever go outside again – bidding up anything virtual, and selling down anything related to the real world.

Which led to this surreal situation in October 2020 (circled), where Zoom was a $160 billion company, while BP and Shell were worth just $150 billion – combined!!

Source: Bloomberg/7IM

Fast forward to today though – away from the COVID-19 claustrophobia and panic – and markets have re-evaluated.

Video calls are still important, but maybe not the ONLY thing in the world.

Oil is back at around $80, BP and Shell are worth more than $300bn and Zoom is worth around $20bn.

Decisions made in one-off scary or stressful moments are often affected by our emotions. What feels sensible at the time, can end up seeming surreal a few months later …

I hope you have found this interesting but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Volatility Update

Markets remain volatile in the wake of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the emergency loan given to Credit Suisse by the Swiss Central bank, and this really isn’t surprising, markets hate a crisis of confidence.

By way of reassurance, I just thought I would share with you a couple of paragraphs from an update I have just received from Scottish Widows, in response to this renewed volatility:

What does it mean for our investors and our portfolios?

The issues that have arisen over the past couple of weeks appear to be contained in several US regional banks, and in our view, any troubles these firms are experiencing do not represent a systemic problem for investments globally. But these events have served to highlight how uncertainty can cause volatility in financial markets, particularly as they have come in the wake of the significant investment rises and falls that we have seen for several years.

While we understand that when market falls occur, they are unsettling for investors, we believe it's important not to panic and react hastily. As such, while we continue to assess events, we are maintaining a focus on our long-term approach to investing - an approach that we believe leads to better investment outcomes.

Notwithstanding any current volatility and challenges for investment markets, we still have confidence in the outlook for returns over the long term. Risks or volatility in one investment type, or one region, tend to be smoothed out by the moves in others. This effect could be seen in markets in recent days; when equities declined on the back of news about Credit Suisse and SVB, many government bonds rose in value. This is why diversification is key.

We are not making any asset allocation changes on the back of the market moves we have seen this month. Furthermore, we do not expect there to be any fundamental changes to the long-term returns or volatility of investment asset classes. We are maintaining our investment discipline and long-term investment focus. This is because our experience shows that markets tend to return to growth over the longer term.

If you would like a copy of the Scottish Widows update, please do let me know.

Have an enjoyable weekend.

I hope you have found this helpful but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

The Lifetime Allowance (LTA) has Gone!

Thank goodness for that!

This was possibly the most ill-conceived tax I have seen introduced in my lifetime and I have been encouraging clients to continue their funding, firmly in the belief that common sense would prevail, and it would eventually go.

The LTA was much misunderstood, it led to poor decision making and ultimately led to poor outcomes. I know of people who stopped funding their pensions as they approached this limit and some who even declined employer contributions into their schemes.

It was also a tax that penalised those who adopted a sensible investment strategy. I have had clients ask whether they should move their pension fund into cash once they hit the limit, so as not to incur a tax charge by benefitting from further investment growth? Pension funds are invested in shares and bonds, a vital driver of the economy, a tax that discourages this behaviour is a very ill-thought-out tax indeed.   

When it was introduced, it was expected that it would be successful businesspeople and the wealthy in general who would be affected but, because of the incredibly generous nature of Public Sector pension schemes, it also hit doctors, consultants, senior police officers and senior military ranks; the law of unintended consequences at work.

Let’s be clear, the ONLY reason this tax has been rescinded is because of the impact on highly valued Public Sector employees, and it is for this reason that opposition parties are unlikely to oppose it in the way they would if it were just the ‘wealthy’ that would be seen to benefit.

It’s tempting to say, ‘well this won’t affect many people’ but, over time, fiscal drag (the freezing of allowances) would have seen more and more people dragged into the net and I am glad that it is gone.

When/if Labour win the next General Election, it is possible that they could reinstate this tax and this means I will be having conversations with clients over the next 18 months about whether there is now a window of opportunity for them to crystallise their benefits to reduce tax in case a reinstatement was to happen.

I have yet to fully digest the implications of this unexpected change so watch this space.    

I hope you have found this helpful but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) – Further Update

Following my e-mail of yesterday, concerning the collapse of SVB and Signature Bank over the weekend, EBI (our investment partners) have produced some additional commentary which you might find interesting; please click on the link below:

EBI Market Update - Silicon Valley Bank


You may need to press Ctrl and click at the same time to open this.

As I am typing, the FTSE 100 in the UK is up 1.13% and the S&P 500 in the US is up 2.03%, erasing at least some of the last couple of days losses. For now at least, widespread contagion seems unlikely.  

I hope you have found this helpful but, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance related matter, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner