What are Rachel Reeves Options for Raising £22bn in Taxes?

Despite the title's inference, I intend to refrain from entering into detailed speculation about what Rachel Reves might or might not do in her first budget on 30 October. Instead, I simply want to look at her options if we take the Labour Party’s election manifesto pledges on tax at face value.  

How much room for manoeuvre does Rachel Reeves have if these pledges are honoured?

Here’s how UK tax receipts looked in 2023/24 – about a trillion pounds in total, according to the latest ONS data:

Reeves has said she will not increase the big four — Income Tax, National Insurance VAT, and Corporation Tax — so what options are left?

It will be hard to find £20bn there – particularly when it’s dominated by Council Tax and Fuel Duty, which are politically challenging to increase.

I think a reform of Council Tax in some form has been well reported, but aside from that, increases in Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and Inheritance Tax (IHT), the most likely targets for a left-leaning administration, will need to be substantial if a meaningful amount of money for public services is to be raised. But, how would a significant increase in CGT fit in with Labour’s stated aim of driving growth? Penalising entrepreneurship does not seem a sensible way to go.

Labour could introduce brand new taxes of course, a Wealth Tax for example, but I think most experts are of the view this would be very difficult to implement and administer in such a short period of time.

Looking at the first chart, it’s obvious that Income Tax, NI, and VAT are the most significant contributors to the public coffers, and it seems to me that, sooner or later, someone will have to make changes there. I remember when I first started work, on a very modest salary, I might add, that the basic rate of Income Tax was 33%!

We won’t have long to wait to see what the new tax landscape will look like; 30th October will be upon us before we know it.  

I hope you found the above interesting. As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Warren Buffet has sold 50% of Berkshire Hathaway’s stake in Apple – should we be worried?

There were many stories in the market chaos of last week.

One of the big ones was what the Sage of Omaha, Warren Buffet was up to…

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway investment fund always releases its quarterly results on a Saturday and when it did so two weekends ago, it came as something of a shock. The reason for the shock was that Berkshire’s report showed Buffett cut his stake in Apple by HALF (selling about ~$75 billion worth of shares).

Not terribly helpful for already nervous markets. It potentially matters to us because Apple is the largest single holding in most of ebi’s (our preferred investment partner) portfolios. Portfolio Vantage Earth 60 has exposure to Apple of approximately 1.4%, for example.

But I want to talk about the unintended consequences.

BECAUSE Buffett has sold Apple shares, all of the major stock indices (S&P 500, MSCI USA, Russell 1000, etc etc) will have to INCREASE their weight to Apple. They’ll be buying about an extra $40bn* worth come September.

So, if you own any of the normal US trackers, you’ll be increasing your Apple holding in about a month.

You see, the rules governing stock indices** say that when big long-term investors hold a lot of shares, these shouldn’t be considered as publicly available to buy.

And the weights in indices are defined by what’s publicly available – what the likes of you and I can buy.

While Warren (the literal definition of a big, long-term investor) was holding his Apple shares, he effectively had removed them from play—only 96% of Apple was publicly available.

With most companies, that sort of rounding doesn’t matter.

But Apple is worth $3.3 trillion. So adding back in 4% is actually the same as adding a whole Goldman Sachs, or Disney, or Uber. It just goes to show how absolutely huge Apple really is!

Although Warren Buffet's sale of $75 billion of Apple is significant, the company's market cap of $3.3 trillion does put it into perspective.

The following chart looks at Apple’s share price since 14th August last year. The impact of last week’s market turmoil can plainly be seen, as can the recovery when others will have seen the fall in price as a buying signal. It’s also worth noting that the share price is still up over 24% since this time last year.

In summary, when looked at in the proper context, the answer to the question posed in the title is no, we shouldn’t be worried.

 

*200 million shares, as per Piper Sandler research

**20 pages of rules for you here 😉 - https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/index-policies/methodology-sp-float-adjustment.pdf

 

I hope you found the above interesting. As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

 

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

Has the Fed got it wrong……again?

As most of you will know, the Bank of England (BoE) cut interest rates last week from 5.25% to 5.0%, a small but significant change. This was the first rate cut since the 2020 pandemic, when rates fell to a historic low of just 0.1% 

Since the end of 2021, interest rates around the globe have increased sharply in response to a significant spike in inflation, largely caused by rising energy prices and the unwinding of restrictions following COVID. As the rate of inflation eventually began to fall, central banks were expected to be able to take the brakes off, and interest rates would start coming down. At the beginning of the year, the first rate reductions were priced into global stock markets as expected in the Spring; however, stickier-than-anticipated inflation in the US has meant that we have all had to wait longer than we had hoped.

Deciding when to reduce interest rates is a difficult balance for central banks to achieve. Cut too soon, and inflation simply rears its head again as more money floods into the economy; cut too late, and unemployment can rise sharply, driving the economy into recession. Cooling inflation while keeping unemployment at historically low levels has been the ideal scenario, or what economists like to call a “soft landing.” 

The BoE cut rates last week, but the US Federal Reserve (the US central bank) did not. Following the Fed’s decision not to cut rates US economic indicators have moved sharply in the wrong direction, suggesting that the US could be headed for a recession, something the Fed will have desperately been trying to avoid.

The result of the worsening numbers in the US has been a global stock sell-off, and everyone is now asking, ‘Should the Fed have cut rates this month after all?’    

The following is taken from Portfolio Adviser magazine on Friday of last week.

‘Hiring in the US slowed sharply last month and the unemployment rate rose, stoking fears about the state of the world's largest economy.

Employers added 114,000 jobs in July, official figures showed, fewer than expected and far lower than in June.

Global stock markets are already on edge after earlier US data showed weaker manufacturing activity, and major companies such as Intel and Amazon published a string of disappointing financials.

The employment figures suggest the long-running jobs boom in the US might be coming to an end, as the highest borrowing costs in two decades weigh on the economy.

The three major share indexes in the US, which were hitting new records just a few weeks ago, have been on a downward slide in recent days. It has sparked fears which have also spread to international markets.

In Asia and Europe, most major indexes were down on Friday, with Japan's Nikkei 225 index tumbling, to close nearly 6% lower.

Neil Birrell, chief investment officer at Premier Miton Investors, said the US jobs data, which showed the unemployment rate rising to 4.3% from 4.1% in June, "couldn’t have been released at a more sensitive time".

"Markets are wobbling, concerns over Fed policy abound and corporate earnings are in the spotlight," he said. "The weak data will cause more angst, and concerns over the health of the economy will increase."

The Federal Reserve, unlike other central banks including the Bank of England, has held off cutting interest rates in recent months, pointing to relatively strong growth, as a healthy job market helps prop up consumer spending.

But the head of the bank, Jerome Powell, said this week that the labour market had cooled significantly over the last 12 months. Friday's report showed the unemployment rate rising to 4.3%, compared with 3.5% a year ago.

Mr Powell signalled it was likely to cut rates at its next meeting in September, warning he did not want to see further weakening in the labour market. 

But Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, said the latest figures raised questions about whether the Fed had waited too long. "Job gains have dropped below the 150,000 threshold that would be considered consistent with a solid economy," she said.

"A September rate cut is in the bag and the Fed will be hoping that they haven’t, once again, been too slow to act."

The most important thing to remember is that these market falls will be temporary, normal service will be resumed, and new highs will be tested.

I hope you found the above interesting. As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

ebi Awards

As you will know, the majority of the portfolios our clients access through their pensions and investments are managed by ebi (ebi is an acronym that stands for ‘evidence based investments.’) and I am delighted to report that they have recently been recognised with a number of awards from industry bodies Professional Adviser and Defaqto (see below).

Professional Adviser

ebi won Best Model Portfolio Service at the Professional Adviser Awards 2024.  

Defaqto

Two of the Vantage Earth Managed Portfolio Service (MPS) Portfolios were recognised by Defaqto, an independent financial product and market intelligence firm, at the inaugural MPS Comparator Award Winners event.   

  • MPS Comparator Growth         - Highly Commended - ebi  Vantage Earth 80

  • MPS Comparator Adventurous - Highly Commended - ebi Vantage Earth 90

The Defaqto MPS Comparator Awards are given to individual MPS portfolios that exhibit market-leading risk-adjusted performance over five years to March 31st, 2024. Leading model portfolios within each comparator peer group achieve an award, either as the absolute winner or as one of the next four highly commended models.

I am obviously delighted that our investment partners have been recognised in this way, as it demonstrates to our clients that their investments are in good hands.

I hope you found the above interesting. As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.


Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Labour and the Pension 25% Tax-Free lump sum

Following Labour’s historic win in last night’s General Election, many of my clients will be pondering what changes might lie ahead for their taxes. Rachel Reeves, the incoming Chancellor, has ruled out increasing taxes on ‘working people’, but who does that actually exclude? – even King Charles works!

BUT, many other taxes could be increased to enable Labour to meet its spending commitments. I will resist the temptation to list the possibilities here because it would just be speculation. However, a radio interview Keir Starmer gave last week provided some welcome clarity on one possible option. In answer to a question, he appeared to suggest that the 25% tax-free lump sum that individuals can take from their personal pensions was under threat.

Amid confusion over Starmer's statement, the Labour leader’s office issued a statement clarifying the party’s position. The statement said;

‘The ability to withdraw 25% of your pension as a tax-free lump sum is a permanent feature of the tax system, and Labour is not planning to change this.’

The possible removal of the 25% tax-free lump sum has been a topic of conversation prior to every Budget since I came into financial services some 44 years ago, so this clarity at a time of great political change is extremely helpful for those planning their retirement.

I hope you found the above interesting. As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

How Much Impact Does the UK Prime Minister Have on Stocks?

With a General Election and a possible change of government looming, it’s natural for investors to look for a connection between who resides in 10 Downing Street and which way stocks will go. But regardless of who wins, decades of returns show that stocks have trended upward.

Exhibit 1 shows the growth of £1 invested in the UK market over almost 70 years and 17 prime ministers (from Winston Churchill’s final months to Rishi Sunak). We can see that over the long run, the market has provided substantial returns regardless of who’s in charge.

EXHIBIT 1

Growth of a Pound Invested in the FTSE All-Share Index

January 1955–December 2023

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Index is not available for direct investment; therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual fund.

That’s because shareholders are investing in companies, which focus on serving their customers and growing their businesses, regardless of which government is in charge.

 Prime ministers may have an impact on market returns, but so do many other factors—the actions of foreign leaders, interest rate movements, changing oil prices and technological advances, to name a few.

The bigger picture is that stocks have rewarded disciplined investors over time—regardless of who has won high-profile elections.

I hope you found the above interesting and, as always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Why is it taking so long?

The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) assembled on Threadneedle St last week to update the market on interest rate trends.

As always, the event was less about the headline decision—rates held at 5.25%, shock—than the commentary that surrounded it.

The Bank is forecasting inflation to come down to 1.9% in two years and 1.6% in three years. A key takeaway was Governor Andrew Bailey expressing optimism and even suggesting:

“Rates could come down faster than market expectations.”

What we tend to then hear from clients (particularly those with mortgages!) is:

“If inflation is falling and is forecast to drop to below the 2% target, why ‘hold’…. what are they waiting for?!”

Good question!

If, like me, you’ve found yourself scanning the internet for a place in the world that has more than 48 hours of nice weather, you’ll have part of the answer…

There are reasons to feel optimistic about the economy, and with prices slowly going down, it’s easy to forget that some pockets of the inflation basket have been more stubborn than anticipated.

Despite being a distant memory, the pandemic squeezed a large number of businesses, many of which sit within the services sector (including travel!).

With this sector trying to meet its needs, prices have increased by almost 30% since Covid-19. And the Bank said there are still some signs of inflation persistence, with services inflation at 5% in March.

As the Monetary Policy Committee grapples with when to stick or twist, it’s worth keeping in mind your summer holidays. Even though travel restrictions are no longer a problem, we can only do so (literally) at the expense of a four-year-old foe!

Stock markets have moved forward again over the past week, with the Dow Jones touching an intra-day high of 40,000 yesterday, suggesting that the first interest rate cuts are expected sooner rather than later.

I hope you found the above interesting. As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Is the FTSE at new highs a ‘win’ for the UK?

I am grateful to my friends at 7IM for the chart below.

There’s been a lot of buzz around the FTSE 100 hitting new highs in the past few weeks.

This index, which contains the 100-largest constituents of the London Stock Exchange, has been boosted by optimism around interest rate cuts and an easing of geopolitical tensions.

This hasn’t gone unnoticed by UK papers. A group of London-listed companies doing well is something worth reporting, and “a win for the UK!”

But looking at the businesses that make up the index, it got us thinking: Is it really a win for the UK?

Accepting that headline performance is just a sum of its 100 parts, we took a look.

The likes of Shell and AstraZeneca have been the source of such growth recently and because they are so big, the wider index benefits.

But what is the revenue exposure that these companies have to the UK? Very little:

Source: Bloomberg/7IM

The fact that many companies operate with a more global outreach has removed much of the importance of their listing country. When companies think about growth, they’re less worried about the domestic economy and more interested in sector consolidation and industry-specific needs. It’s much less a matter of geography.

Look at London-listed mining company Anglo American last week, for example. ASX-listed (Australia) metals and mining company BHP made an £31bn offer to acquire Anglo American. Is it an investment in the UK? No. It’s more to do with some of AA’s major copper mines that BHP wants a piece of, based on how aggressively this metal is in demand for the production of renewable technology.

Whilst a map offers familiarity and comfort, if we had to set our investment compass, we’d be more inclined to measure where we are by sectors and factors rather than borders.

I hope you found the above interesting and, as always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

Might YOU have some money somewhere with your name on it?

Two in five of us have money in lost and forgotten insurance policies, pensions, child trust funds, and forgotten investments.  We’ve traced quite a few such ‘pots of gold’ for clients over the years.

Now, though, there’s a website that lets you do it yourself. https://www.gretel.co.uk/ has been set up by a collection of financial institutions that have many old forgotten accounts on their books that they’d love the rightful owners to claim. Registration is free, and amongst others, it's trusted by big firms like M&G and AVIVA. So, what are you waiting for?

I do hope you or your family and friends are able to unearth some forgotten treasures using this service. If you are successful, please do let me know, I love to hear any good luck stories.

As always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner

 

The stock market is at a record high, but it’s not a bad time to invest!

The following article appeared in yesterday’s Sunday Times, and I thought its timing was interesting, given that the market (as measured by the S&P 500 Index) is actually some 5.46% below its closing high in late March (The S&P 500 hit 5,254 on 28th March 2024 and at close of business on Friday it stood at 4,967). It’s a good article nonetheless, reminding us that just because the market is at, or close to a high, it can still go higher. In fact, I googled how often does the S&P 500 hit a new high and the answer is a staggering 17 times a year, on average or more than once in every 20 trading days. Remember though, that’s on average since the 1950s.  

Here is the article by David Brenchley of Market Watch.

“Just like death and taxes, it is a certainty in life that when the stock markets hit an all-time high, the bears come out of hibernation. Stocks are in a bubble, they will say, the market is going to crash. Bears are pessimistic investors, the opposite of bulls. They will say that now is the time to sell our investments.

When the S&P 500, a stock market index of the biggest US companies, went into freefall in 2022, plunging 27.5 per cent, sceptics thought that it would take years to recover. But already this year it has hit an all-time high on more than 20 occasions.

The naysayers have been proved wrong so far, but they continue to insist that their predictions will play out eventually. Take the bearish investor Jeremy Grantham, the founder of the fund group GMO, who has predicted 12 of the last four stock market crashes, including the dotcom bust and the financial crisis. He thinks that crash number 13 is just round the corner. Actually, Grantham thinks that we’re still only halfway through 2022’s slump, which was “rudely interrupted by the launch of ChatGPT” last year. Artificial intelligence stocks are “a bubble within a bubble”, he reckons.

For those who aren’t up on the investment lingo, a bubble is when share prices within a certain stock index or theme soar in a short space of time, often with little in the way of business fundamentals to back them up. Other stock market gurus have voiced their concern, including the former US Treasury secretary Larry Summers, who thinks we are “at the foothills of a bubble”.

And it’s hard to argue against this when the likes of Nvidia, which makes the semiconductor chips that power generative AI, is up 203 per cent in the past year, and the Facebook owner Meta Platforms has risen 132 per cent. That kind of share price growth doesn’t happen often and should ring alarm bells.

I consolidated three old workplace pensions into a self-invested personal pension (Sipp) a year ago, giving myself more control over my retirement pot. Since then I have been cautious about investing the cash because markets have risen quickly. Memories of investing a lump sum inheritance into my stocks and shares Isa in mid-2021, only to see the value of those investments slump in 2022 are fresh. So, feeling rather burnt by bad decisions/timing/investments/all of the above, this time I am doing the opposite and slowly drip-feeding money into the market.

But perhaps I shouldn’t be so cautious. Just because the stock market is at an all-time high, it doesn’t mean that it’s about to crash. It could be that I was just unlucky three years ago. The thing about an all-time high is that it is only an all-time high until it is usurped by a higher one. In fact, you tend to make more money over the next 12 months if you invest when the market is at an all-time high than you do if you invest at any other time. That’s what the fund house Schroders found, anyway.

Historically, the average return a year after the US stock market has hit an all-time high is 10.3 per cent. That compares with a return of 8.6 per cent if you invest at all other times, according to Schroders data going back to 1926. Even more than three years after an all-time high, average returns were 7.6 per cent, versus 7.5 per cent at all other times.

If you had put $100 into the market 30 years ago and stayed invested throughout, you would have $864 today. If you had invested the same amount 30 years ago but sold your holdings and moved into cash each time the market finished a month at a record high (and gone back into stocks when it wasn’t at a record high), you would have $403 today — 53 per cent less. That’s encouraging.

“It is normal to feel nervous about investing when the stock market is at an all-time high, but giving in to that feeling would have been damaging for your wealth,” said Duncan Lamont from Schroders. “There may be valid reasons for you to dislike stocks, but the market being at an all-time high should not be one of them.”

What will eventually be the core of my portfolio are funds which invest in global companies such as the Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap, Vanguard LifeStrategy 100% Equity and Dimensional International Value funds. But instead of piling cash into these holdings, I have been focusing on other areas because global stocks look expensive.

I’ve been building up my positions in funds and investment trusts that focus on UK smaller companies, emerging markets and infrastructure, as well as those that back firms with positive environmental impacts. This means that while my core investments have performed well, up about 10 per cent, it’s only a small part of my portfolio — for now.

But I have begun to regret not topping up these core funds. I had been waiting for the S&P 500 to slip, which was what the bears convinced me would happen, before I start to put more meaningful amounts into those funds.

Nvidia’s price-to-earnings (PE) ratio, a popular stock valuation metric that divides a company’s share price by its earnings per share, is 73, according to the data firm Sharepad. The lower the PE ratio, the potentially cheaper the stock, and anything over 25 is generally seen as expensive. Yet, when you judge Nvidia on the earnings it is predicted to generate in three years’ time, its PE ratio falls to a much more palatable 24. Does this mean I have been sold a duff investment theory by the bears?

The counterpoint to my cautious approach is that my workplace pension, which is held with a different firm, has been automatically investing about a third of my monthly contributions into the SSGA International Equity Index fund, which has been benefiting from the markets’ rise.

Speaking of certainties in life, here’s another one: returns from the stock market always beat inflation if you invest for 20 years or more. Between 1926 and 2022, there was no 20-year period where US large-cap stocks didn’t outperform inflation, Schroders found. The takeaway of all this is that timing the market doesn’t really matter if you’re investing over the long term, which I am because I won’t be able to get at my Sipp for at least another 21 years — and let’s face it, probably more.

I should probably get a move on, forget about past mistakes and start putting my cash to work faster than I have been. Market highs be damned”.

I hope you found this interesting and, as always, if you have any questions about this piece or any other finance-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely,

Graham Ponting CFP Chartered MCSI

Managing Partner